Rubric

Find Rubric
Read and Do: Food Environments
Read and Do: Food Environments
Criteria Ratings Pts
CCR Reading Anchor 1: Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. (Apply this standard to text of appropriate complexity as outlined by Standard 10.)
threshold: pts
2 pts
Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. (RI/RL 9-10.1) · Application: Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date
1.5 pts
Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. (RI/RL. 8.1)
1 pts
Cite textual evidence that supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
0.5 pts
With prompting and support, cite textual evidence supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
pts
2 pts
--
CCR Reading Anchor 2: Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas. (Apply this standard to texts of appropriate complexity as outlined by Standard 10.)
threshold: pts
2 pts
Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text. (RI/RL.9-10.2) Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; summarize complex concepts, processes, or information presented in a text by paraphrasing them in simpler but still accurate terms. (RST.11- 1
1.5 pts
Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including its relationship to supporting ideas and characters, setting, and plot; provide an objective summary of the text. (RI/RL. 8.2) Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; trace the text's explanation or depiction of a complex process, phenomenon, or concept; provide an accurate summary of the text. (RST.9-10.2)
1 pts
Attempts to select information relevant to task, purpose, and audience but some information may not be relevant Attempts to organize information Demonstrates some attempt at organization, but often places ideas in an unclear order that disrupts the natural flow or cohesion Occasionally uses varied sentence structures, but these appear alongside mostly simple sentences Transitions are simple and infrequent May use organizational strategies inappropriately or ineffectively, such as attempting to use a comparison when it is not warranted Demonstrates inconsistent development of ideas often presenting facts (sometimes in isolation from one another) with little insight, interpretation, or clarification. Provides minimal or irrelevant examples and/or details for support.
0.5 pts
Offers little or no organizational structure, placing ideas in no logical order Uses little if any variety in sentence structures Ineffective or absent information creates a lack of cohesion Few, if any, transition words or phrases are used Minimally develops ideas (may be too much or too little information, or the wrong approach)
pts
2 pts
--
CCR Reading Anchor 5: Analyze the structure of texts, including how specific sentences, paragraphs, and larger portions of the text (e.g., a section, chapter, scene, or stanza) relate to each other and the whole. (Apply this standard to texts of appropriate complexity as outlined by Standard
threshold: pts
2 pts
Analyze in detail how an author’s ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text (e.g., a section or chapter). (RI.9-10.5) Analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the structure an author uses in his or her exposition or argument, including whether the structure makes points clear, convincing, and engaging. (RI.11-12.5)
1 pts
With prompting and support, analyze in detail how an author’s ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text (e.g., a section or chapter). With prompting and support, analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the structure an author uses in his or her exposition or argument, including whether the structure makes points clear, convincing, and engaging.
0 pts
Analyze in detail the structure of a specific paragraph in a text, including the role of particular sentences in developing and refining a key concept. (RI .8.5)
0 pts
With the support of a teacher and classmates, participate in a close reading in order to analyze in detail the structure of a specific paragraph in a text, including the role of particular sentences in developing and refining a key concept.
pts
2 pts
--
CCR Language Anchor 1: Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking.
threshold: pts
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
Rating Description
pts
1 pts
--
CCR Anchor 2: Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing.
threshold: pts
1 pts
Full Marks
0 pts
Rating Description
pts
1 pts
--
CCR Reading Anchor 6: Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
threshold: pts
2 pts
Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose. Analyze a case in which grasping point of view requires distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant (e.g. satire, sarcasm, irony, or understatement).
1.5 pts
Identify multiple examples of common rhetorical appeals in a text (logos, pathos, ethos) and describe how the author uses this rhetoric to advance the point of view or purpose, independently. Identify specific examples in a case which require distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant (e.g. satire, sarcasm, irony, or understatement) and describe how these examples reveal the author’s point of view or purpose, independently.
1 pts
Identify multiple examples of common rhetorical appeals in a text (logos, pathos, ethos) with some teacher and/or peers assistance. Identify specific examples in a case which require distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant (e.g. satire, sarcasm, irony, or understatement) with some teacher or peer assistance.
0.5 pts
Identify examples of common each rhetorical appeals in a text (logos, pathos, ethos) with teacher assistance. Identify a specific example in a case which requires distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant (e.g. satire, sarcasm, irony, or understatement) with teacher assistance.
pts
2 pts
--
Total Points: 10 out of 10